01.
Live Connected
We have a strong sense of community
|
02.
Be Transformed
We have a strong sense of community
|
03.
Change The World
We have a strong sense of community
Table of Contents
- Fictional Foundations of Trinitarian Thought
- Dedication
- Trinitarian Artistic Depictions
- Introduction
- Part One Biblical Discussion
- Why People Believe in the Trinity
- Principles of Bible Interpretation
- A Great Deception
- Identifying the Legitimate to Avoid the Counterfeit
- Who is the “us”?
- Elohim, Words Are Important, Their Meanings Matter
- Echad, Words Are Important, Their Meanings Matter
- Veiled Speech and Parables
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) That Arise From the New Testament
- FAQ 1: How can God be a solitary God, absolutely alone in His Deity, if God and Jesus Christ are Divine?
- FAQ 2: How can we, finite created beings, expect to know and un¬derstand God, an eternal, infinite Being?
- FAQ 3: The Right Hand of God
- FAQ 4: The Prologue of John (John 1:1-14)
- FAQ 5: Kenosis Texts
- FAQ 6: Did Jesus create heaven and earth?
- Part Two Historical Discussion
- The Influence of the Post-Apostolic Church on Doctrinal Beliefs Today
- Philosophy, and its Influence on the Church
- The Background and Doctrine of the Post-Apostolic Church Leaders
- Clement of Rome
- Ignatius
- Polycarp
- Justin
- Irenæus
- Tertullian
- Origen
- Athanasius the Great
- Augustine
- Basil
- The Cappadocians
- Gregory Nazianzen
- Gregory Nyssen
- Church Leaders Summary
- The Councils and Creeds of the Post-Apostolic Church
- The Inquisition
- Michael Servetus
- Epilogue
It may appear in this section that I am attempting to characterize the Church fathers as villains, or pagans, or perhaps even servants of the devil. Be assured that is neither my goal, nor my desire. I look upon the doctrine of the Trinity as a mistake, a grievous mistake, but yet it was a mistake made by men attempting to do what they believed God would have them do. I make no attempt to judge their actions or condemn their motives; I merely want to illustrate the overpowering influence of pagan Grecian philosophy that was implemented during the development of Christian theology. This influence, which far outweighed the influence of the Bible, has been denied and ignored by the Orthodox Christian Church. It has been taken for granted that the foundation of Church doctrine laid down by the Church fathers was accurate, therefore exempting it from any thorough examination in the light of the Bible. This is a more serious error than that of the Church fathers.
Concerning the post-apostolic church fathers, Schaff makes the following comments:
This class consists of Barnabas, Clement of Rome, Ignatius, Polycarp, and in a broader sense, Hermas, Papias, and the unknown authors of the Epistle to Diognetus, and of the Didache.
Of the outward life of these men, their extraction, education, and occupation before conversion, hardly anything is known….But the pious story of the martyrdom of several of these fathers, as their entrance into perfect life, has been copiously written. They were good men rather that great men, and excelled more in zeal and devotion to Christ than in literary attainments. They were faithful and practical workers, and hence of more use to the church in those days than profound thinkers or great scholars could have been.[1]
I have not included Barnabas in this discussion because the epistle that is assigned to his authorship has been determined to be spurious by most authorities. I have also not included a discussion of the unknown authors referred to for the obvious reason. On the other hand, I have included other post-apostolic leaders because of their contribution to the development of church doctrine. Another title, possibly more accurately descriptive of these leaders, would be ante-Nicene fathers
[1] History of the Christian Church, by Phillip Schaff, Volume II, Published 1887 by Charles Scribner’s Sons, p. 633.
Connect with me
Email Address
kgm_whoisjesus@yahoo.com