We have a strong sense of community
We have a strong sense of community
Change The World
We have a strong sense of community
By Keith G. Morehead
Robert A. Sabin
One of the words Trinitarians use to support the concept of “three in one” in the Old Testament is “echad.” Echad (eh-‘ghahd) is the Hebrew word translated one, only, and alone in the Old Testament. It occurs 962 times in the Bible (Gesenius, pp. 28, 29) and is translated 903 times (by my count) as the word one, five times as the word alone, and one time as the word only.
The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament has the following information on the word echad:This word occurs 960 times [there exists a discrepancy on the number of occurrences between authors] as a noun, adjective, or adverb, as a cardinal or ordinal number, often used in a distributive sense. It is closely identified with yahad “to be united” and with ro’sh “first, head,” especially in connection with the “first day” of the month (Gen 8:13). It stresses unity while recognizing diversity within that Oneness. Sometimes the phrase ” as one man” can mean “all at once” (Num 14:15), but when Gideon was told he would defeat Midian ” as one man” it probably meant ” as easily as a single man” (Jud 6:16) The phrase can also refer to a nation aroused to take united action against gross injustice (Jud 20:8; I Sam 11:7). Zephaniah’s mention of people serving God “with one shoulder” (3:9) likely means “shoulder to shoulder,” solidly united. Likewise in Ex 24:3 “with one voice” expresses that all Israel was involved in entering into the Covenant with Yahweh. The concept of unity is related to the tabernacle, whose curtains are fastened together to form one unit (Ex 26:6, 11; 36:13). Adam and Eve are described as “one flesh” (Gen 2:24), which includes more than sexual unity. In Gen 34:16 the men of Shechem suggest intermarriage with Jacob’s children in order to become “one people.” Later, Ezekiel predicted that the fragmented nation of Israel would someday be reunited, as he symbolically joined two sticks (37:17). Once again Judah and Ephraim would be one nation with one king (37:22). Abraham was viewed as “the one” from whom all the people descended (Isa 51:2; Mal 2:15), the one father of the nation. Diversity within unity is also seen from the fact that `echad has a plural form, `ahadim. It is translated “a few days” in Gen 27:44; 29:20, and Dan 11:20. In Gen 11:1 the plural modifies “words”: “the whole earth used the same language and the same words.” Apparently it refers to the same vocabulary, the same set of words spoken by everyone at the tower of Babel. The first “same” in Gen 11:1 is singular , analogous to “the same laws” of the Passover applying to native-born and foreigner (Ex 12:49; cf. Num 15:16), or to the “one law” of sure death for approaching the Persian king without invitation (Est 4:11). In the famous Shema of Deut 6:4, “Hear, O Israel….the LORD is one,” the question of diversity within unity has theological implications. Some scholars have felt that, though “one” is singular, the usage of the word allows for the doctrine of the Trinity. While it is true that this doctrine is foreshadowed in the OT, the verse concentrates on the fact that there is but one God and that Israel owes it exclusive loyalty to him (Deut 5:9; 6:5)” (Harris, Archer, Waltke, Volume 1, p.30).
A second reference on echad states:A numeral having the power of an adjective. 1. The same, Genesis 40:5, Job 31:15. 2. First, but only so used in counting the days of the months, Ezra 10:16, 17; in counting years, Daniel 9:1,2, Ezra 1:1. In other places as Genesis 1:5, one does not lose the common idea of a cardinal, and the numbers follow one another as in Latin unus, alter, tertius. 3. some one, “some one of the people;” “no one.” 4. it acts the part of an indefinite article, especially in the later Hebrew, 1 Kings 20:13, “a certain prophet;” Daniel 8:3, “a ram,” 1 Kings 19:4. So also when one precedes, e.g. “a certain holy one,” i.e. angel Daniel 8:13. Sometimes also by a genitive “one of the cisterns,” i.e. some cistern, Genesis 37:20; Job 2:10. 5. one only of its kind, Job 23:13; Ezekiel 7:5, Canticles 6:9. 6. When repeated it is one…another, Exodus 17:12; 18:3. It even occurs three times repeated, 1 Samuel 10:3; 13:17, 18. Also distributively of individuals, Number. 13:2, “ye shall send one man to a tribe;” Numbers 34:18. 7. As one man, i.e. together. Ezra 2:64, “the whole congregation together;” Ezra 3:9; 6:20; Ecclesiastes 11:6, “both alike.” Also i.q. “together, unitedly,” Isaiah 65:25; in the same sense is said Judges 20:8; 1 Samuel 11:7. 8. For one time, once, 2 Kings 6:10; Psalms 62:12. 9. (a) i.q. No. 8, Num. 10:4. (b) Suddenly, Pro. 28:18. (c) i.q. altogether, Jer. 10:8. 10. One after another, one by one , Isa 27:12, and Ecc. 7:27, one after another…” (Gesenius, pp.28-29).
The chief application of this interpretation by Trinitarians is in the Shema found in Deuteronomy 6:4: Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one (echad) LORD. Hebrew: Shema Israel, Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai echad. They believe that since elohim is a uniplural noun describing the three members of the Trinity as the one God, and echad is a uniplural adjective describing several items in one unit or group, that the Shema is a perfect description of the triune God. The Trinitarian interpretaition results in Deuteronomy 6:4 ceasing to be a verse supporting the onliness of God; it becomes a verse portraying the characteristics of their triune God. They interpret it to say: Hear O Israel, our three separate Jehovahs, is one unit of Jehovah.
When God made this finite universe, He made man subject to death. He told Adam and Eve, “But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die” (Genesis 2:17). Eating will bring an end to your existence. Thus there was a threat against humanity even in the original creation. The Bible says, “no man hath seen God at any time” (John 1:18). That means that Adam and Eve did not see Him. We read in the Bible that God walked with them in the cool of the day, and He spoke to them. When Satan came to Eve, it seemed to her that what he had to say was just as official and believable as what the Lord had said. Satan said, “Hath God said you will surely die. God knows that you will not die. God knows that if you eat this you will be as wise as He is” (Genesis 3:4, 5). Somehow those two bits of advice were played against each other, and the weight of evidence plus the attractive fruit, seemed to be on the side of the devil. So Eve actually partook of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Then the finiteness of humanity became evident.
A Solemn Address to the Deity
By Sir Isaac Watts
Genesis 2:24: Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one (echad) flesh.
The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT) states: “Adam and Eve are described as “one flesh”(Genesis 2:24), which includes more than sexual unity” but when we use 1 Corinthians 6:16 as a cross reference, it appears that it means exactly sexual unity causing them to be “one flesh.” What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.
Exodus 24:3 And Moses came and told the people all the words of the LORD, and all the judgments: and all the people answered with one (echad) voice .
One what? One person’s reply? No! One voice. Does “one voice” being heard mean that of “all the people” there was only one individual speaking? Of course not! It is simply understood to be the voice of many people speaking in unison so that you heard one sound. In this text using the word echad, does “one” really mean “one” in the context that it is meant to be used?
Numbers 13:23 And they came unto the brook of Eshcol, and cut down from thence a branch with one (echad) cluster of grapes, and they bare it between two upon a staff.
Again, you must ask yourself the question: One what? One grape? No. One cluster of grapes. Is one cluster of grapes the same as one grape? Absolutely not! In addition to that, the word here is grapes (plural). If echad was used in reference to the word grapes, the phrase would be nonsensical. In the phrase, “one cluster,” does one sufficiently describe what the numeral “one” is supposed to describe? Without a doubt!
The majority of texts are similar:
Of the 943 times (by my count) echad is translated “one,” it is translated to indicate a single character 901 times. In the remaining instances when it is involved in describing a group effort, it still means one.
In reference to the Shema, the claim that the linking of the word Elohim and echad in the same statement indicate plurality of God is totally unfounded. So much bias has been infused into that statement that the accuracy of it is negligible. It becomes a Trinitarian doctrinal statement instead of a Biblical description of God. Deuteronomy 6:4 is speaking of ONE WHAT? ONE GOD! This is made clear by the scribe’s reply to Jesus’ statement that the Shema was the most important commandment in Mark 12:32, “Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he. ” If elohim or echad are referring to more than one of anything, they are referring to more than one GOD, which would make Trinitarians polytheists, or at least tritheists. Remember, for elohim to indicate any plurality, it would indicate a plurality of gods; not one God in three but three gods. If the Bible could be quoted as saying one gods, Trinitarians may have a legitimate argument, but that very statement would be contradictory. It would have to declare “one Trinity.”
Keith G. Morehead, Fictional Foundations of Trinitarian Thought , Oneness Ministries, 1988.
R. Laird Harris, Gleason L Archer Jr., Bruce K Waltke, Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament.
H. W. F. Gesenius, Translated by Samuel Prideaux Tregelles, LL.D., Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament (Baker Book House, copyright 1979).
In 1989 we focused on those who already believed in Jesus for their “gift” of eternal life.Our first and foremost objective was to correct what we considered the errors of the doctrine of the Trinity and show that Jesus is the one and only Almighty God manifest in the flesh.Jesus is not the second person of the Trinity or eternal son of God.He is the one true God, creator of the world, born as a baby on this earth to be Immanuel, God with us. The Holy Spirit or spirit of God is not the third person of the Trinity, it is God’s spirit.Anyone not supporting the doctrine of the Trinity is deemed a heretic by the Orthodox Christian Church.We were known as “Oneness Pentecostals” and our understanding about Jesus is considered heresy.Oneness Pentecostals are a relatively small group but there are those within the ranks that had and have stringent criteria for salvation.It is unfortunate that political pressure influenced our spiritual objectives but it did.These facts caused us to skirt the most critical question “What is Most important?” After all the attempts at “political correctness” over the years it is time to speak plainly about “What is Most Important?”
Welcome to Church
Always Glad to You
Senior Pastor of Church
"Engaging God's world through faith"
For I am convinced that neither angels nor demons, neither death nor life, neither the present nor the future, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God.